"Because the people that wrote the bible had little if any understanding of infinity; we should, with a high probability of being correct, remove the title of infinity from God. At the very least, we know that the understanding of infinity has greatly changed since it was bestowed to God"first, the IDEA of infinity existed BEFORE math could explain it. then, math did explain it--according to what their theorems/worlds of thoughts allowed/said so. hence, it's clear that math made a definition of infinity for its own purpose. a definition of infinity FOR mathematics. it is not all encompassing. why then negate the whole idea of infinity assigned to those outside mathematics? you say infinity is a concept. it is a concept not exclusive to your math. the idea of infinity was there. math USED it. then, there are people say math OWNS it. *********we are given freewill. freewill necessitated a thinking brain and a feeling heart. that's all we needed. (our bodies, our form, how we look are not covered by that free will. being humans as we are is not our choice)there is good. there is evil. we were not *automatically* given these. otherwise, the one who gave us free will would have violated our free will if something was forced to us. if good was forced to us. if evil was forced to us.but since good and evil were there. they were left there. they were not taken away/hidden from us either. otherwise, just the same as the first case, our free will would have been violated.so good and evil were there. and we have free will to choose if we want to know about them or not. and after we know about them, which one we are to follow. it's up to us as free beings.we were given a command. yes. but it was up to us to obey. or disobey.****thanks for the opportunity to respond
Thanks, Kathy. I liked what you had to say, I'm not sure we are exactly on the same page. (but not too far off) I hope to discuss this with you further. You can email me at Garrett@eviltheists.com, or I will just reply to you again in this comment page. However for rite now I have to get to work. I just wanted to say thanks.
hi, i think i'll just wait for your comment here. but actually im more interested about free will. i also hope to discuss more on this topic. i'll also find time to read your other blog posts. thanks.
The idea of infinity existed way before math was able to explain it. That was kind of my point, that a people with next to no REAL understanding of infinity, deemed God to be infinite. My understanding is that they gave all the good things to God, infinite love, forgiveness, etc. However now-a-days we understand that infinity is pretty much just a concept. If the universe was infinite (as much as I would hope that it is) it would be forced to include God and an infinite amount of things larger then God, not to mention infinite forms of life. My point, at least in this article, was that we shouldn’t label God infinite anymore, because the meaning of the word has changed; how about just that God is great. Although I am an Atheist and completely believe that God is something that man created. Perhaps believe is the wrong word, I think it is the most plausible theory, and if a more plausible theory comes around and is able to hold water, then I would probably move on to that one.Free will is a broad concept and like many things, people’s view of it varies greatly. What is your thought, do you think we are the only creatures on earth that have free will? Or do animals have it too? I personally don't think that we have free will, at least no different than any other creature on earth. We can of course override biology with free will, like saving someone’s life at our own demise. There are many things we can choose to do, but there are also many more we can't. That’s just the summed up version of my view on free will, as I said it is a huge topic. What are your thoughts?
i think i get your point about infinity. if what you mean is that infinity is simply a concept of an implausible state. that nothing really can be infinite (if i still don't get it, just leave a short note and i'll find time to think it over)as regards free will, the argument "there are many things we can choose to do, but there are also many more we can't" is usually raised by students new to existentialism classes, when they start talking about free will, choice, responsibilities, etc. if i can borrow what existential philosopher Sartre said, "we are merely thrown into this world." what we are is how we were made to be and where we are is where we were placed. we can't control that. but who we are, how we will live our lives, it is up to us. there are things that we can't do about. (we can accept this as fact or not. nonetheless, they remain) we can always choose. then we are free. ..unless we want free will to mean that we can will ourselves to be, will other things to be according to our liking, will the universe to be something else. but for me this is clearly a flawed concept of free will.my summed up version, our free will is contained in our current state and the current state of things outside of us. (and unfortunately we cannot will ours or others' current state to be otherwise.) we are free to change only we can change. because we don't have super powers and we don't exist seclusion, we only have one universe to share with others.i have 2 pet dogs and they are very much dear to me. and i also think they like me very much. i'd like to believe that they *made a choice* to like me and be loyal to me. but i cannot converse with them so i can't know their thoughts. but in the current state of things, i don't think their free will is much like what human beings have.***this is (again) very long for a comment. i'm sorry for flooding your blog. i think im soon going to start my own blog (which ive been postponing for a decade)thanks for letting me share my thoughts.
oh, about my comment about the existentialism class, actually i wanted to share that i also raised that question when we studied free will in first year college.
Free will is a very broad subject indeed, and I think a lot of people go their entire lives without defining it, or worse, they define it as only having the choice to choose God or not, and nothing more. It has been a long time since I took humanities classes in college, and I’m sure my views have varied since then but this is the gist of what I think:We (as humans) on a basic level, have the same free will as animals do, except that we have a much more evolved consciousness and understanding of 'the self'. But our choices are dictated in much the same way as animals choices are. I too have a dog, and if he had the option, he would run wild down the street, not because he doesn't like me (hopefully) but because he is driven by his hunger and sexual needs that are stimulated by all the different odors he can discern.Free will is similar to morals; it can vary wildly and everybody should have their own definition for it. Thank you for your insight. Be sure to send me a link to your blog once you get it up and going. As a side note, what are your religious beliefs?
:)I believe I am a creation. I’m not a product of chance. And just as all other creations, I was created with a purpose. I believe my creator is good. Because I was created with reverence and respect. I know because I am unique and wonderful. I believe my creator is mindful of me. Because I was given a life of my own. I could have been a mere subject—no free will of my own. But I am free. Free to enjoy that goodness of existence.It is not my choice to exist. I did not choose my form or condition. But I exist, nonetheless. And I am given freedom to live my life as I will it.In my existence, I remember I am a creation. I remember my creator. And I remember that I am created for a purpose—that which my creator willed. I am free. Yet my life is not mine, as my purpose is not for myself—but for and of my creator.What good is a creation that doesn't serve its purpose?I am free to will my own will. But I choose to will according to the will of my creator. Because I remember I am a creation.And by my will, I give thanks. What greater pleasure is there for a creation, in its freedom, to willfully please the creator? I believe my creator is God. And that Jesus is His Son.I believe that religion is often harsh and unkind. But God is not like that; He is good. And Jesus is equally good.Therefore, I am not religious. I am a Christian—born again in Christ Jesus.***Why I believe in God and why I want to please Him. I tried to make it as simple as I can at the time of my writing this. But I expect many who would read to find loopholes. I am just hoping that soon I would be able to share in better language and detail what I believe in why I believe it. Your question was actually difficult. You asked me to summarize my beliefs as a comment to a blog (but minus many of the intricacies of my beliefs, of course). It was a hard task to explain it to an atheist. But I’m so glad I had the chance to do it. I hope you continue to listen to my thoughts as I continue to listen to yours. You’re free to contradict, it’s alright. And I’m looking forward to more thinking and sharing with you.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Our conversation, along with my rebuttal, has been moved to Here http://www.eviltheists.com/2011/04/conversation-with-katherine.htmlYou can continue to comment here or on that page and I will update it in the post.
What's your opinion?